Reasons to choose Mavica FD-200
Released in 2002, Mavica FD-200 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 520 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Sony Mavica FD-200
vs Sony Mavica FD-95
VS
Sensor area
21 mm²
Mavica FD-20021 mm²
Mavica FD-95- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Mavica FD-200 and Mavica FD-95 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
Mavica FD-200MetricMavica FD-95
1.9 MPEffective pixels1.9 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
3.35 µmPixel pitch3.35 µm
11.22 µm²Pixel area11.22 µm²
8.91 MP/cm²Pixel density8.91 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
520 gWeight900 g
Disk 3.5" (2x speed) or MemoryStick (slot)StorageDisk 3.5", MemoryStick via adapter
InfoLithium (NP-F330)BatteryInfoLithium (NP-F330)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Mavica FD-200 and Mavica FD-95 have the same sensor area. The Mavica FD-200 has the lighter body. The Mavica FD-200 and Mavica FD-95 have the same effective resolution. The Mavica FD-200 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Mavica FD-95
Released in 2000, Mavica FD-95 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 900 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.