Reasons to choose WB110
Released in 2013, WB110 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 20.2 MP effective resolution, and a 385 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Samsung WB110
vs Samsung WB800F
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
WB11028 mm²
WB800F- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The WB110 and WB800F have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
WB110MetricWB800F
20.2 MPEffective pixels16.3 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.19 µmPixel pitch1.32 µm
1.41 µm²Pixel area1.75 µm²
70.98 MP/cm²Pixel density57.27 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
385 gWeight218 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
4×AA TypeBatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The WB110 and WB800F have the same sensor area. The WB800F has the lighter body. The WB110 has the higher effective resolution. The WB110 and WB800F were both released in 2013. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose WB800F
Released in 2013, WB800F has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.3 MP effective resolution, and a 218 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.