Reasons to choose ST200F
Released in 2012, ST200F has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16 MP effective resolution, and a 341 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Samsung ST200F
vs Samsung WB150F
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
ST200F28 mm²
WB150F- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The ST200F and WB150F have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
ST200FMetricWB150F
16 MPEffective pixels14.2 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.33 µmPixel pitch1.42 µm
1.78 µm²Pixel area2 µm²
56.22 MP/cm²Pixel density49.9 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video1,280 × 720
341 gWeight341 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
Lithium-Ion SLB-10A rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion SLB-10A rechargeable battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The ST200F and WB150F have the same sensor area. The ST200F and WB150F have the same body weight. The ST200F has the higher effective resolution. The ST200F and WB150F were both released in 2012. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose WB150F
Released in 2012, WB150F has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14.2 MP effective resolution, and a 341 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.