Reasons to choose dk 3000
Released in 2004, dk 3000 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.14 MP effective resolution, and a 175 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei dk 3000
vs Rollei Prego da4
VS
Sensor area
21 mm²
dk 300025 mm²
Prego da4- Area ratio
- 1.17:1
- Absolute difference
- 4 mm²
- Relative difference
- 16.5%
The Prego da4 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
dk 3000MetricPrego da4
3.14 MPEffective pixels4.1 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.61 µmPixel pitch2.46 µm
6.79 µm²Pixel area6.06 µm²
14.73 MP/cm²Pixel density16.51 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
175 gWeight167 g
Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery1x CR-V3, 2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Prego da4 has the larger sensor area. The Prego da4 has the lighter body. The Prego da4 has the higher effective resolution. The dk 3000 and Prego da4 were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Prego da4
Released in 2004, Prego da4 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.1 MP effective resolution, and a 167 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.