CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei Compactline 52
vs Rollei Kids 100

Archive illustration for Rollei Compactline 52

Rollei / 2010

Compactline 52

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei Kids 100

Rollei / 2010

Kids 100

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
Compactline 52
58 mm²
Kids 100
Area ratio
2.04:1
Absolute difference
30 mm²
Relative difference
104.1%

The Kids 100 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

Compactline 52MetricKids 100
5 MPEffective pixels0.3 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor8.8 × 6.6
2.39 µmPixel pitch13.91 µm
5.69 µm²Pixel area193.6 µm²
17.57 MP/cm²Pixel density0.52 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor3.93
—Maximum video—
95 gWeight250 g
microSDStorage—
2x AAABattery4x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Kids 100 has the larger sensor area. The Compactline 52 has the lighter body. The Compactline 52 has the higher effective resolution. The Compactline 52 and Kids 100 were both released in 2010. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Compactline 52

Released in 2010, Compactline 52 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 95 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Kids 100

Released in 2010, Kids 100 has about 58 mm² of sensor area, 0.3 MP effective resolution, and a 250 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras