Reasons to choose Compactline 425
Released in 2011, Compactline 425 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 105 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei Compactline 425
vs Rollei Sportsline 60 Camouflage
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
Compactline 42528 mm²
Sportsline 60 Camouflage- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Compactline 425 and Sportsline 60 Camouflage have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
Compactline 425MetricSportsline 60 Camouflage
14 MPEffective pixels5 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.43 µmPixel pitch2.39 µm
2.03 µm²Pixel area5.69 µm²
49.19 MP/cm²Pixel density17.57 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
105 gWeight98 g
SD/SDHCStoragemicroSD, microSDHC
Alkaline batteries, 2x 1.5 V AABattery2x AAA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Compactline 425 and Sportsline 60 Camouflage have the same sensor area. The Sportsline 60 Camouflage has the lighter body. The Compactline 425 has the higher effective resolution. The Compactline 425 and Sportsline 60 Camouflage were both released in 2011. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Sportsline 60 Camouflage
Released in 2011, Sportsline 60 Camouflage has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 98 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.