Reasons to choose Compactline 350
Released in 2010, Compactline 350 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei Compactline 350
vs Rollei Flexline 202
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
Compactline 35028 mm²
Flexline 202- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Compactline 350 and Flexline 202 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
Compactline 350MetricFlexline 202
12 MPEffective pixels12 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.54 µmPixel pitch1.54 µm
2.37 µm²Pixel area2.37 µm²
42.17 MP/cm²Pixel density42.17 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
120 gWeight126 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Compactline 350 and Flexline 202 have the same sensor area. The Compactline 350 has the lighter body. The Compactline 350 and Flexline 202 have the same effective resolution. The Compactline 350 and Flexline 202 were both released in 2010. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Flexline 202
Released in 2010, Flexline 202 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 126 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.