Reasons to choose Compactline 103
Released in 2010, Compactline 103 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 104 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei Compactline 103
vs Rollei Powerflex 3D
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
Compactline 10328 mm²
Powerflex 3D- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Compactline 103 and Powerflex 3D have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
Compactline 103MetricPowerflex 3D
10 MPEffective pixels5.2 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.67 µmPixel pitch2.31 µm
2.77 µm²Pixel area5.33 µm²
36.07 MP/cm²Pixel density18.76 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
104 gWeight127 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStoragemicroSD, microSDHC
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Compactline 103 and Powerflex 3D have the same sensor area. The Compactline 103 has the lighter body. The Compactline 103 has the higher effective resolution. The Compactline 103 and Powerflex 3D were both released in 2010. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Powerflex 3D
Released in 2010, Powerflex 3D has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 5.2 MP effective resolution, and a 127 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.