Reasons to choose GR IIIx
Released in 2021, GR IIIx has about 367 mm² of sensor area, 24.24 MP effective resolution, and a 262 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Ricoh GR IIIx
vs Sony ZV-E10
VS
Sensor area
367 mm²
GR IIIx367 mm²
ZV-E10- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The GR IIIx and ZV-E10 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
GR IIIxMetricZV-E10
24.24 MPEffective pixels24.2 MP
23.5 × 15.6Sensor23.5 × 15.6
3.89 µmPixel pitch3.89 µm
15.12 µm²Pixel area15.15 µm²
6.61 MP/cm²Pixel density6.6 MP/cm²
1.53Crop factor1.53
1,920 × 1,080Maximum video3,840 × 2,160
262 gWeight343 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC/MS Pro Duo
DB-110 lithium-ion battery Li-ion batteryBatteryNP-FW50 lithium-ion battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The GR IIIx and ZV-E10 have the same sensor area. The GR IIIx has the lighter body. The GR IIIx has the higher effective resolution. The GR IIIx and ZV-E10 were both released in 2021. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose ZV-E10
Released in 2021, ZV-E10 has about 367 mm² of sensor area, 24.2 MP effective resolution, and a 343 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.