CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Praktica DMMC
vs Samsung Digimax 250

Archive illustration for Praktica DMMC

Praktica / 2006

DMMC

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung Digimax 250

Samsung / 2004

Digimax 250

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

17 mm²
DMMC
15 mm²
Digimax 250
Area ratio
1.14:1
Absolute difference
2 mm²
Relative difference
13.9%

The DMMC has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

DMMCMetricDigimax 250
2 MPEffective pixels1.9 MP
4.8 × 3.6Sensor4.5 × 3.37
2.94 µmPixel pitch2.83 µm
8.64 µm²Pixel area7.98 µm²
11.57 MP/cm²Pixel density12.53 MP/cm²
7.21Crop factor7.7
—Maximum video—
97 gWeight144 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DMMC has the larger sensor area. The DMMC has the lighter body. The DMMC has the higher effective resolution. The DMMC is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DMMC

Released in 2006, DMMC has about 17 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 97 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Digimax 250

Released in 2004, Digimax 250 has about 15 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 144 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras