Reasons to choose DCZ 2.2 S
Released in 2003, DCZ 2.2 S has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Praktica DCZ 2.2 S
vs Praktica Mini
VS
Sensor area
31 mm²
DCZ 2.2 S31 mm²
Mini- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The DCZ 2.2 S and Mini have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
DCZ 2.2 SMetricMini
2 MPEffective pixels3.2 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
3.92 µmPixel pitch3.1 µm
15.36 µm²Pixel area9.6 µm²
6.51 MP/cm²Pixel density10.42 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
160 gWeight90 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABattery2x AAA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The DCZ 2.2 S and Mini have the same sensor area. The Mini has the lighter body. The Mini has the higher effective resolution. The Mini is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Mini
Released in 2004, Mini has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 3.2 MP effective resolution, and a 90 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.