Reasons to choose DC Slim 2
Released in 2004, DC Slim 2 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Praktica DC Slim 2
vs Praktica DCZ 2.2 S
VS
Sensor area
31 mm²
DC Slim 231 mm²
DCZ 2.2 S- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The DC Slim 2 and DCZ 2.2 S have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
DC Slim 2MetricDCZ 2.2 S
2 MPEffective pixels2 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
3.92 µmPixel pitch3.92 µm
15.36 µm²Pixel area15.36 µm²
6.51 MP/cm²Pixel density6.51 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
120 gWeight160 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AAABattery2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The DC Slim 2 and DCZ 2.2 S have the same sensor area. The DC Slim 2 has the lighter body. The DC Slim 2 and DCZ 2.2 S have the same effective resolution. The DC Slim 2 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose DCZ 2.2 S
Released in 2003, DCZ 2.2 S has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.