Reasons to choose K-m
Released in 2008, K-m has about 369 mm² of sensor area, 10.2 MP effective resolution, and a 590 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Pentax K-m
vs Pentax K200D
VS
Sensor area
369 mm²
K-m369 mm²
K200D- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The K-m and K200D have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
K-mMetricK200D
10.2 MPEffective pixels10.2 MP
23.5 × 15.7Sensor23.5 × 15.7
6.01 µmPixel pitch6.01 µm
36.17 µm²Pixel area36.17 µm²
2.76 MP/cm²Pixel density2.76 MP/cm²
1.53Crop factor1.53
—Maximum video—
590 gWeight690 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2 x AA Alkaline, Lithium or NiMH BatteriesBatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The K-m and K200D have the same sensor area. The K-m has the lighter body. The K-m and K200D have the same effective resolution. The K-m and K200D were both released in 2008. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose K200D
Released in 2008, K200D has about 369 mm² of sensor area, 10.2 MP effective resolution, and a 690 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.