CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Panasonic PV DC3000
vs Praktica DCZ 3.3

Archive illustration for Panasonic PV DC3000

Panasonic / 2000

PV DC3000

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Praktica DCZ 3.3

Praktica / 2002

DCZ 3.3

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
PV DC3000
38 mm²
DCZ 3.3
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The PV DC3000 and DCZ 3.3 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

PV DC3000MetricDCZ 3.3
3.34 MPEffective pixels3.34 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.37 µmPixel pitch3.37 µm
11.35 µm²Pixel area11.35 µm²
8.81 MP/cm²Pixel density8.81 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
239 gWeight370 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageCompactFlash type I
4x AABattery4x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The PV DC3000 and DCZ 3.3 have the same sensor area. The PV DC3000 has the lighter body. The PV DC3000 and DCZ 3.3 have the same effective resolution. The DCZ 3.3 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose PV DC3000

Released in 2000, PV DC3000 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.34 MP effective resolution, and a 239 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DCZ 3.3

Released in 2002, DCZ 3.3 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.34 MP effective resolution, and a 370 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras