Reasons to choose E2n
Released in 1997, E2n has about 58 mm² of sensor area, 1.4 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Nikon E2n
vs Nikon E3
VS
Sensor area
58 mm²
E2n58 mm²
E3- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The E2n and E3 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
E2nMetricE3
1.4 MPEffective pixels1.4 MP
8.8 × 6.6Sensor8.8 × 6.6
6.44 µmPixel pitch6.44 µm
41.49 µm²Pixel area41.49 µm²
2.41 MP/cm²Pixel density2.41 MP/cm²
3.93Crop factor3.93
—Maximum video—
—Weight—
—Storage—
NiMH accuBatteryNiMH accu
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The E2n and E3 have the same sensor area. The E2n and E3 have the same body weight. The E2n and E3 have the same effective resolution. The E3 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose E3
Released in 1998, E3 has about 58 mm² of sensor area, 1.4 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.