Reasons to choose DG-3Z
Released in 2003, DG-3Z has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.24 MP effective resolution, and a 310 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Konica DG-3Z
vs Konica Revio C2
VS
Sensor area
21 mm²
DG-3Z13 mm²
Revio C2- Area ratio
- 1.59:1
- Absolute difference
- 8 mm²
- Relative difference
- 59%
The DG-3Z has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
DG-3ZMetricRevio C2
3.24 MPEffective pixels1.2 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor4.23 × 3.17
2.57 µmPixel pitch3.34 µm
6.58 µm²Pixel area11.17 µm²
15.2 MP/cm²Pixel density8.95 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor8.19
—Maximum video—
310 gWeight70 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery2x AAA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The DG-3Z has the larger sensor area. The Revio C2 has the lighter body. The DG-3Z has the higher effective resolution. The DG-3Z is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Revio C2
Released in 2002, Revio C2 has about 13 mm² of sensor area, 1.2 MP effective resolution, and a 70 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.