CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Konica DG-2
vs Konica Revio C2

Archive illustration for Konica DG-2

Konica / 2001

DG-2

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Konica Revio C2

Konica / 2002

Revio C2

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
DG-2
13 mm²
Revio C2
Area ratio
1.59:1
Absolute difference
8 mm²
Relative difference
59%

The DG-2 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

DG-2MetricRevio C2
2.11 MPEffective pixels1.2 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor4.23 × 3.17
3.18 µmPixel pitch3.34 µm
10.1 µm²Pixel area11.17 µm²
9.9 MP/cm²Pixel density8.95 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor8.19
—Maximum video—
425 gWeight70 g
CompactFlash type IStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
4x AABattery2x AAA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DG-2 has the larger sensor area. The Revio C2 has the lighter body. The DG-2 has the higher effective resolution. The Revio C2 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DG-2

Released in 2001, DG-2 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 2.11 MP effective resolution, and a 425 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Revio C2

Released in 2002, Revio C2 has about 13 mm² of sensor area, 1.2 MP effective resolution, and a 70 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras