Reasons to choose EasyShare C160
Released in 2009, EasyShare C160 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 9.2 MP effective resolution, and a 110 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare C160
vs Kodak EasyShare CD90
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
EasyShare C16028 mm²
EasyShare CD90- Area ratio
- 1.12:1
- Absolute difference
- 3 mm²
- Relative difference
- 11.6%
The EasyShare CD90 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
EasyShare C160MetricEasyShare CD90
9.2 MPEffective pixels12 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.64 µmPixel pitch1.52 µm
2.7 µm²Pixel area2.31 µm²
37.04 MP/cm²Pixel density43.28 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
110 gWeight129 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare CD90 has the larger sensor area. The EasyShare C160 has the lighter body. The EasyShare CD90 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare C160 and EasyShare CD90 were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare CD90
Released in 2009, EasyShare CD90 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 129 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.