CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Kodak EasyShare DX3600
vs Kodak mc3

Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare DX3600

Kodak / 2001

EasyShare DX3600

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Kodak mc3

Kodak / 2001

mc3

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

31 mm²
EasyShare DX3600
31 mm²
mc3
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The EasyShare DX3600 and mc3 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

EasyShare DX3600Metricmc3
2.2 MPEffective pixels0.3 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
3.74 µmPixel pitch10.12 µm
13.96 µm²Pixel area102.4 µm²
7.16 MP/cm²Pixel density0.98 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
250 gWeight198 g
Internal storageStorageCompact Flash
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAAA (3) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EasyShare DX3600 and mc3 have the same sensor area. The mc3 has the lighter body. The EasyShare DX3600 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare DX3600 and mc3 were both released in 2001. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EasyShare DX3600

Released in 2001, EasyShare DX3600 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 2.2 MP effective resolution, and a 250 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose mc3

Released in 2001, mc3 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 0.3 MP effective resolution, and a 198 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras