Reasons to choose EasyShare DX3500
Released in 2001, EasyShare DX3500 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 2.2 MP effective resolution, and a 225 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare DX3500
vs Konica Q-M200
VS
Sensor area
31 mm²
EasyShare DX350031 mm²
Q-M200- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EasyShare DX3500 and Q-M200 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
EasyShare DX3500MetricQ-M200
2.2 MPEffective pixels2.11 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
3.74 µmPixel pitch3.82 µm
13.96 µm²Pixel area14.56 µm²
7.16 MP/cm²Pixel density6.87 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
225 gWeight340 g
Internal storageStorageCompactFlash type I
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)Battery3x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare DX3500 and Q-M200 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare DX3500 has the lighter body. The EasyShare DX3500 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare DX3500 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Q-M200
Released in 1999, Q-M200 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 2.11 MP effective resolution, and a 340 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.