Reasons to choose EasyShare DX3215
Released in 2001, EasyShare DX3215 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 1.2 MP effective resolution, and a 260 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare DX3215
vs Kodak mc3
VS
Sensor area
21 mm²
EasyShare DX321531 mm²
mc3- Area ratio
- 1.44:1
- Absolute difference
- 9 mm²
- Relative difference
- 44.1%
The mc3 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
EasyShare DX3215Metricmc3
1.2 MPEffective pixels0.3 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor6.4 × 4.8
4.22 µmPixel pitch10.12 µm
17.77 µm²Pixel area102.4 µm²
5.63 MP/cm²Pixel density0.98 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
260 gWeight198 g
Internal storageStorageCompact Flash
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAAA (3) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The mc3 has the larger sensor area. The mc3 has the lighter body. The EasyShare DX3215 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare DX3215 and mc3 were both released in 2001. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose mc3
Released in 2001, mc3 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 0.3 MP effective resolution, and a 198 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.