Reasons to choose JD 4.1 xz3
Released in 2003, JD 4.1 xz3 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.13 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Jenoptik JD 4.1 xz3
vs Jenoptik JD C 2.1 LCD
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
JD 4.1 xz331 mm²
JD C 2.1 LCD- Area ratio
- 1.24:1
- Absolute difference
- 6 mm²
- Relative difference
- 23.7%
The JD C 2.1 LCD has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
JD 4.1 xz3MetricJD C 2.1 LCD
4.13 MPEffective pixels2 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor6.4 × 4.8
2.45 µmPixel pitch3.92 µm
6.01 µm²Pixel area15.36 µm²
16.63 MP/cm²Pixel density6.51 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
160 gWeight110 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABattery4x AAA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The JD C 2.1 LCD has the larger sensor area. The JD C 2.1 LCD has the lighter body. The JD 4.1 xz3 has the higher effective resolution. The JD 4.1 xz3 and JD C 2.1 LCD were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose JD C 2.1 LCD
Released in 2003, JD C 2.1 LCD has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 110 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.