Reasons to choose JD 2100 F
Released in 2002, JD 2100 F has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 2.11 MP effective resolution, and a 116 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Jenoptik JD 2100 F
vs Jenoptik JD 3.3x4 ie
VS
Sensor area
21 mm²
JD 2100 F21 mm²
JD 3.3x4 ie- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The JD 2100 F and JD 3.3x4 ie have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
JD 2100 FMetricJD 3.3x4 ie
2.11 MPEffective pixels3.1 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
3.18 µmPixel pitch2.62 µm
10.1 µm²Pixel area6.88 µm²
9.9 MP/cm²Pixel density14.54 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
116 gWeight190 g
CompactFlash type IStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The JD 2100 F and JD 3.3x4 ie have the same sensor area. The JD 2100 F has the lighter body. The JD 3.3x4 ie has the higher effective resolution. The JD 2100 F and JD 3.3x4 ie were both released in 2002. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose JD 3.3x4 ie
Released in 2002, JD 3.3x4 ie has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 190 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.