CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

HP Photosmart R927
vs HP Photosmart R967

Archive illustration for HP Photosmart R927

HP / 2006

Photosmart R927

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for HP Photosmart R967

HP / 2006

Photosmart R967

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
Photosmart R927
38 mm²
Photosmart R967
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Photosmart R927 and Photosmart R967 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Photosmart R927MetricPhotosmart R967
8.2 MPEffective pixels10.1 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.15 µmPixel pitch1.94 µm
4.62 µm²Pixel area3.75 µm²
21.64 MP/cm²Pixel density26.65 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
200 gWeight190 g
Internal storageStorageSecure Digital
HP Lithium-Ion rechargeable supplied Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Photosmart R927 and Photosmart R967 have the same sensor area. The Photosmart R967 has the lighter body. The Photosmart R967 has the higher effective resolution. The Photosmart R927 and Photosmart R967 were both released in 2006. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Photosmart R927

Released in 2006, Photosmart R927 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8.2 MP effective resolution, and a 200 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Photosmart R967

Released in 2006, Photosmart R967 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 10.1 MP effective resolution, and a 190 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras