Reasons to choose E1035
Released in 2008, E1035 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 10.54 MP effective resolution, and a 145 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
GE E1035
vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX2
VS
Sensor area
42 mm²
E103545 mm²
Lumix DMC-LX2- Area ratio
- 1.06:1
- Absolute difference
- 3 mm²
- Relative difference
- 6.2%
The Lumix DMC-LX2 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
E1035MetricLumix DMC-LX2
10.54 MPEffective pixels10 MP
7.53 × 5.64Sensor7.76 × 5.81
2.01 µmPixel pitch2.12 µm
4.03 µm²Pixel area4.51 µm²
24.82 MP/cm²Pixel density22.18 MP/cm²
4.6Crop factor4.46
—Maximum video—
145 gWeight220 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageInternal storage
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Lumix DMC-LX2 has the larger sensor area. The E1035 has the lighter body. The E1035 has the higher effective resolution. The E1035 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Lumix DMC-LX2
Released in 2006, Lumix DMC-LX2 has about 45 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 220 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.