Reasons to choose X-E4
Released in 2021, X-E4 has about 367 mm² of sensor area, 26.1 MP effective resolution, and a 364 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Fujifilm X-E4
vs Ricoh GR IIIx
VS
Sensor area
367 mm²
X-E4367 mm²
GR IIIx- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The X-E4 and GR IIIx have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
X-E4MetricGR IIIx
26.1 MPEffective pixels24.24 MP
23.5 × 15.6Sensor23.5 × 15.6
3.75 µmPixel pitch3.89 µm
14.05 µm²Pixel area15.12 µm²
7.12 MP/cm²Pixel density6.61 MP/cm²
1.53Crop factor1.53
4,096 × 2,160Maximum video1,920 × 1,080
364 gWeight262 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
NP-W126S Li-ion battery Li-ion batteryBatteryDB-110 lithium-ion battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The X-E4 and GR IIIx have the same sensor area. The GR IIIx has the lighter body. The X-E4 has the higher effective resolution. The X-E4 and GR IIIx were both released in 2021. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose GR IIIx
Released in 2021, GR IIIx has about 367 mm² of sensor area, 24.24 MP effective resolution, and a 262 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.