Reasons to choose SL300R T
Released in 2003, SL300R T has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.17 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Contax SL300R T
vs Contax U4R
VS
Sensor area
21 mm²
SL300R T21 mm²
U4R- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The SL300R T and U4R have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
SL300R TMetricU4R
3.17 MPEffective pixels4 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
2.59 µmPixel pitch2.31 µm
6.73 µm²Pixel area5.33 µm²
14.87 MP/cm²Pixel density18.76 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
125 gWeight140 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The SL300R T and U4R have the same sensor area. The SL300R T has the lighter body. The U4R has the higher effective resolution. The U4R is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose U4R
Released in 2004, U4R has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.