Reasons to choose Eye-Q 1000
Released in 2003, Eye-Q 1000 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.3 MP effective resolution, and a 45 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Concord Eye-Q 1000
vs Concord Eye-Q 3040AF
VS
Sensor area
31 mm²
Eye-Q 100031 mm²
Eye-Q 3040AF- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Eye-Q 1000 and Eye-Q 3040AF have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
Eye-Q 1000MetricEye-Q 3040AF
1.3 MPEffective pixels3.1 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
4.86 µmPixel pitch3.15 µm
23.63 µm²Pixel area9.91 µm²
4.23 MP/cm²Pixel density10.09 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
45 gWeight115 g
—StorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AAABattery2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Eye-Q 1000 and Eye-Q 3040AF have the same sensor area. The Eye-Q 1000 has the lighter body. The Eye-Q 3040AF has the higher effective resolution. The Eye-Q 1000 and Eye-Q 3040AF were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Eye-Q 3040AF
Released in 2003, Eye-Q 3040AF has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 115 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.