Reasons to choose Exilim Pro EX-F1
Released in 2008, Exilim Pro EX-F1 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 6 MP effective resolution, and a 671 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Casio Exilim Pro EX-F1
vs Olympus SP 320
VS
Sensor area
38 mm²
Exilim Pro EX-F138 mm²
SP 320- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Exilim Pro EX-F1 and SP 320 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
Exilim Pro EX-F1MetricSP 320
6 MPEffective pixels7.41 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.51 µmPixel pitch2.26 µm
6.32 µm²Pixel area5.11 µm²
15.83 MP/cm²Pixel density19.55 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
671 gWeight180 g
MultiMedia, SDHC, Secure DigitalStoragexD Picture card
Casio NP-100 Li Ion batteryBattery1x CR-V3, 2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Exilim Pro EX-F1 and SP 320 have the same sensor area. The SP 320 has the lighter body. The SP 320 has the higher effective resolution. The Exilim Pro EX-F1 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose SP 320
Released in 2006, SP 320 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 7.41 MP effective resolution, and a 180 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.