Reasons to choose EOS M200
Released in 2019, EOS M200 has about 332 mm² of sensor area, 24.1 MP effective resolution, and a 299 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Canon EOS M200
vs Panasonic Lumix DC-G95
VS
Sensor area
332 mm²
EOS M200225 mm²
Lumix DC-G95- Area ratio
- 1.48:1
- Absolute difference
- 107 mm²
- Relative difference
- 47.7%
The EOS M200 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
EOS M200MetricLumix DC-G95
24.1 MPEffective pixels20.3 MP
22.3 × 14.9Sensor17.3 × 13
3.71 µmPixel pitch3.33 µm
13.79 µm²Pixel area11.08 µm²
7.25 MP/cm²Pixel density9.03 MP/cm²
1.61Crop factor2
3,840 × 2,160Maximum video3,840 × 2,160
299 gWeight533 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
LP-E12 lithium-ion battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-ion Battery Pack Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EOS M200 has the larger sensor area. The EOS M200 has the lighter body. The EOS M200 has the higher effective resolution. The EOS M200 and Lumix DC-G95 were both released in 2019. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Lumix DC-G95
Released in 2019, Lumix DC-G95 has about 225 mm² of sensor area, 20.3 MP effective resolution, and a 533 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.