Reasons to choose DC E1000
Released in 2007, DC E1000 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
BenQ DC E1000
vs BenQ DC X725
VS
Sensor area
38 mm²
DC E100025 mm²
DC X725- Area ratio
- 1.53:1
- Absolute difference
- 13 mm²
- Relative difference
- 52.6%
The DC E1000 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
DC E1000MetricDC X725
10 MPEffective pixels7.2 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.95 µmPixel pitch1.86 µm
3.79 µm²Pixel area3.45 µm²
26.39 MP/cm²Pixel density28.99 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
—Weight—
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery—
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The DC E1000 has the larger sensor area. The DC E1000 and DC X725 have the same body weight. The DC E1000 has the higher effective resolution. The DC E1000 and DC X725 were both released in 2007. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose DC X725
Released in 2007, DC X725 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 7.2 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.