Reasons to choose DC C1020
Released in 2009, DC C1020 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
BenQ DC C1020
vs BenQ DC E1035
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
DC C102028 mm²
DC E1035- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The DC C1020 and DC E1035 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
DC C1020MetricDC E1035
10 MPEffective pixels10 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.69 µmPixel pitch1.69 µm
2.85 µm²Pixel area2.85 µm²
35.14 MP/cm²Pixel density35.14 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
130 gWeight110 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The DC C1020 and DC E1035 have the same sensor area. The DC E1035 has the lighter body. The DC C1020 and DC E1035 have the same effective resolution. The DC C1020 and DC E1035 were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose DC E1035
Released in 2009, DC E1035 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 110 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.