Reasons to choose DC C1000
Released in 2006, DC C1000 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
BenQ DC C1000
vs BenQ DC C630
VS
Sensor area
38 mm²
DC C100025 mm²
DC C630- Area ratio
- 1.53:1
- Absolute difference
- 13 mm²
- Relative difference
- 52.6%
The DC C1000 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
DC C1000MetricDC C630
10 MPEffective pixels6 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.95 µmPixel pitch2.03 µm
3.79 µm²Pixel area4.14 µm²
26.39 MP/cm²Pixel density24.15 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
140 gWeight130 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The DC C1000 has the larger sensor area. The DC C630 has the lighter body. The DC C1000 has the higher effective resolution. The DC C1000 and DC C630 were both released in 2006. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose DC C630
Released in 2006, DC C630 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 6 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.