CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ AC100
vs BenQ GH200

Archive illustration for BenQ AC100

BenQ / 2011

AC100

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ GH200

BenQ / 2012

GH200

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
AC100
28 mm²
GH200
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The AC100 and GH200 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

AC100MetricGH200
14 MPEffective pixels14.1 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.43 µmPixel pitch1.42 µm
2.03 µm²Pixel area2.02 µm²
49.19 MP/cm²Pixel density49.54 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
117 gWeight—
SDHC, SDXC, Secure DigitalStorage—
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery—

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The AC100 and GH200 have the same sensor area. The GH200 has the lighter body. The GH200 has the higher effective resolution. The GH200 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose AC100

Released in 2011, AC100 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 117 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose GH200

Released in 2012, GH200 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14.1 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras