Reasons to choose Optima 830UW
Released in 2009, Optima 830UW has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 158 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
AgfaPhoto Optima 830UW
vs AgfaPhoto sensor 530s
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
Optima 830UW25 mm²
sensor 530s- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Optima 830UW and sensor 530s have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
Optima 830UWMetricsensor 530s
8 MPEffective pixels5 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.76 µmPixel pitch2.23 µm
3.11 µm²Pixel area4.97 µm²
32.21 MP/cm²Pixel density20.13 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
158 gWeight120 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Optima 830UW and sensor 530s have the same sensor area. The sensor 530s has the lighter body. The Optima 830UW has the higher effective resolution. The Optima 830UW and sensor 530s were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose sensor 530s
Released in 2009, sensor 530s has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.