Reasons to choose Compact 102
Released in 2009, Compact 102 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
AgfaPhoto Compact 102
vs AgfaPhoto Optima 103
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
Compact 10228 mm²
Optima 103- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Compact 102 and Optima 103 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
Compact 102MetricOptima 103
12 MPEffective pixels12 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.54 µmPixel pitch1.54 µm
2.37 µm²Pixel area2.37 µm²
42.17 MP/cm²Pixel density42.17 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
125 gWeight100 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Compact 102 and Optima 103 have the same sensor area. The Optima 103 has the lighter body. The Compact 102 and Optima 103 have the same effective resolution. The Optima 103 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Optima 103
Released in 2010, Optima 103 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 100 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.