Reasons to choose WB1100F
Released in 2014, WB1100F has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.2 MP effective resolution, and a 512 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Samsung WB1100F
vs Samsung WB350F
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
WB1100F28 mm²
WB350F- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The WB1100F and WB350F have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
WB1100FMetricWB350F
16.2 MPEffective pixels16.3 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.33 µmPixel pitch1.32 µm
1.76 µm²Pixel area1.75 µm²
56.92 MP/cm²Pixel density57.27 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
1,280 × 720Maximum video1,920 × 1,080
512 gWeight276 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageMicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Li-ion (SLB10A) Li-ion batteryBatterySLB-10A
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The WB1100F and WB350F have the same sensor area. The WB350F has the lighter body. The WB350F has the higher effective resolution. The WB1100F and WB350F were both released in 2014. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose WB350F
Released in 2014, WB350F has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.3 MP effective resolution, and a 276 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.