Reasons to choose ST96
Released in 2011, ST96 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14.6 MP effective resolution, and a 110 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Samsung ST96
vs Samsung WB210
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
ST9628 mm²
WB210- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The ST96 and WB210 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
ST96MetricWB210
14.6 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.4 µmPixel pitch1.43 µm
1.95 µm²Pixel area2.03 µm²
51.3 MP/cm²Pixel density49.19 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
110 gWeight174 g
SDHC, SDXC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion BP70 rechargeable battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The ST96 and WB210 have the same sensor area. The ST96 has the lighter body. The ST96 has the higher effective resolution. The ST96 and WB210 were both released in 2011. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose WB210
Released in 2011, WB210 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 174 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.