Reasons to choose Powerflex 360 Full HD
Released in 2012, Powerflex 360 Full HD has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 18 MP effective resolution, and a 530 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei Powerflex 360 Full HD
vs Rollei Powerflex 800
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
Powerflex 360 Full HD28 mm²
Powerflex 800- Area ratio
- 1.03:1
- Absolute difference
- 1 mm²
- Relative difference
- 2.6%
The Powerflex 360 Full HD has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
Powerflex 360 Full HDMetricPowerflex 800
18 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.26 µmPixel pitch1.41 µm
1.58 µm²Pixel area1.98 µm²
63.25 MP/cm²Pixel density50.5 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
530 gWeight182 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSDHC, SDXC, Secure Digital
Rechargeable Li-Ion battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Powerflex 360 Full HD has the larger sensor area. The Powerflex 800 has the lighter body. The Powerflex 360 Full HD has the higher effective resolution. The Powerflex 360 Full HD and Powerflex 800 were both released in 2012. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Powerflex 800
Released in 2012, Powerflex 800 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 182 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.