Reasons to choose Powerflex 240 HD
Released in 2013, Powerflex 240 HD has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16 MP effective resolution, and a 220 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei Powerflex 240 HD
vs Rollei Sportsline 62
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
Powerflex 240 HD28 mm²
Sportsline 62- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Powerflex 240 HD and Sportsline 62 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
Powerflex 240 HDMetricSportsline 62
16 MPEffective pixels10 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.33 µmPixel pitch1.69 µm
1.78 µm²Pixel area2.85 µm²
56.22 MP/cm²Pixel density35.14 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
220 gWeight—
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorage—
Rechargeable Li-Ion battery Li-ion batteryBattery—
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Powerflex 240 HD and Sportsline 62 have the same sensor area. The Sportsline 62 has the lighter body. The Powerflex 240 HD has the higher effective resolution. The Powerflex 240 HD is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Sportsline 62
Released in 2012, Sportsline 62 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.