Reasons to choose Flexline 140
Released in 2008, Flexline 140 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 126 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei Flexline 140
vs Rollei RCP-8325X
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
Flexline 14038 mm²
RCP-8325X- Area ratio
- 1.37:1
- Absolute difference
- 10 mm²
- Relative difference
- 36.7%
The RCP-8325X has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
Flexline 140MetricRCP-8325X
10 MPEffective pixels8 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor7.11 × 5.33
1.67 µmPixel pitch2.18 µm
2.77 µm²Pixel area4.74 µm²
36.07 MP/cm²Pixel density21.11 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
126 gWeight—
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery—
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The RCP-8325X has the larger sensor area. The RCP-8325X has the lighter body. The Flexline 140 has the higher effective resolution. The Flexline 140 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose RCP-8325X
Released in 2007, RCP-8325X has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.