Reasons to choose dt 3200
Released in 2003, dt 3200 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 3.25 MP effective resolution, and a 185 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei dt 3200
vs Rollei dt 4000
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
dt 320025 mm²
dt 4000- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The dt 3200 and dt 4000 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
dt 3200Metricdt 4000
3.25 MPEffective pixels4.23 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.76 µmPixel pitch2.42 µm
7.64 µm²Pixel area5.87 µm²
13.08 MP/cm²Pixel density17.03 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
185 gWeight185 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
—BatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The dt 3200 and dt 4000 have the same sensor area. The dt 3200 and dt 4000 have the same body weight. The dt 4000 has the higher effective resolution. The dt 3200 and dt 4000 were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose dt 4000
Released in 2003, dt 4000 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.23 MP effective resolution, and a 185 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.