Reasons to choose dk4010
Released in 2005, dk4010 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 350 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei dk4010
vs Rollei Prego dp8300
VS
Sensor area
21 mm²
dk401038 mm²
Prego dp8300- Area ratio
- 1.78:1
- Absolute difference
- 17 mm²
- Relative difference
- 77.8%
The Prego dp8300 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
dk4010MetricPrego dp8300
4 MPEffective pixels8.1 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.31 µmPixel pitch2.16 µm
5.33 µm²Pixel area4.68 µm²
18.76 MP/cm²Pixel density21.37 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
350 gWeight150 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
4x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Prego dp8300 has the larger sensor area. The Prego dp8300 has the lighter body. The Prego dp8300 has the higher effective resolution. The dk4010 and Prego dp8300 were both released in 2005. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Prego dp8300
Released in 2005, Prego dp8300 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8.1 MP effective resolution, and a 150 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.