Reasons to choose da5325 Prego
Released in 2006, da5325 Prego has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5.19 MP effective resolution, and a 128 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei da5325 Prego
vs Rollei dk4010
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
da5325 Prego21 mm²
dk4010- Area ratio
- 1.17:1
- Absolute difference
- 4 mm²
- Relative difference
- 16.5%
The da5325 Prego has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
da5325 PregoMetricdk4010
5.19 MPEffective pixels4 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.33 × 4
2.19 µmPixel pitch2.31 µm
4.79 µm²Pixel area5.33 µm²
20.89 MP/cm²Pixel density18.76 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
128 gWeight350 g
Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AABattery4x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The da5325 Prego has the larger sensor area. The da5325 Prego has the lighter body. The da5325 Prego has the higher effective resolution. The da5325 Prego is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose dk4010
Released in 2005, dk4010 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 350 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.