Reasons to choose d210 motion
Released in 2004, d210 motion has about 15 mm² of sensor area, 2.1 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei d210 motion
vs Rollei Prego dp5200
VS
Sensor area
15 mm²
d210 motion25 mm²
Prego dp5200- Area ratio
- 1.64:1
- Absolute difference
- 10 mm²
- Relative difference
- 63.8%
The Prego dp5200 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
d210 motionMetricPrego dp5200
2.1 MPEffective pixels5.2 MP
4.5 × 3.37Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.69 µmPixel pitch2.19 µm
7.22 µm²Pixel area4.78 µm²
13.85 MP/cm²Pixel density20.93 MP/cm²
7.7Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
120 gWeight130 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Prego dp5200 has the larger sensor area. The d210 motion has the lighter body. The Prego dp5200 has the higher effective resolution. The d210 motion and Prego dp5200 were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Prego dp5200
Released in 2004, Prego dp5200 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5.2 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.