Reasons to choose Compactline 304
Released in 2011, Compactline 304 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 114 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei Compactline 304
vs Rollei Sportsline 60 Camouflage
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
Compactline 30428 mm²
Sportsline 60 Camouflage- Area ratio
- 1.03:1
- Absolute difference
- 1 mm²
- Relative difference
- 2.6%
The Sportsline 60 Camouflage has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
Compactline 304MetricSportsline 60 Camouflage
14 MPEffective pixels5 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.41 µmPixel pitch2.39 µm
1.98 µm²Pixel area5.69 µm²
50.5 MP/cm²Pixel density17.57 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
114 gWeight98 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStoragemicroSD, microSDHC
2x AABattery2x AAA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Sportsline 60 Camouflage has the larger sensor area. The Sportsline 60 Camouflage has the lighter body. The Compactline 304 has the higher effective resolution. The Compactline 304 and Sportsline 60 Camouflage were both released in 2011. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Sportsline 60 Camouflage
Released in 2011, Sportsline 60 Camouflage has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 98 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.