Reasons to choose Compactline 203
Released in 2010, Compactline 203 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 104 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Rollei Compactline 203
vs Rollei Flexline 100 iT
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
Compactline 20325 mm²
Flexline 100 iT- Area ratio
- 1.12:1
- Absolute difference
- 3 mm²
- Relative difference
- 11.6%
The Compactline 203 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
Compactline 203MetricFlexline 100 iT
12 MPEffective pixels10 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.52 µmPixel pitch1.58 µm
2.31 µm²Pixel area2.48 µm²
43.28 MP/cm²Pixel density40.26 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
104 gWeight107 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStoragemicroSD, microSDHC
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Compactline 203 has the larger sensor area. The Compactline 203 has the lighter body. The Compactline 203 has the higher effective resolution. The Compactline 203 and Flexline 100 iT were both released in 2010. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Flexline 100 iT
Released in 2010, Flexline 100 iT has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 107 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.