CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Rollei Compactline 100
vs Rollei Compactline 50

Archive illustration for Rollei Compactline 100

Rollei / 2008

Compactline 100

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei Compactline 50

Rollei / 2009

Compactline 50

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
Compactline 100
28 mm²
Compactline 50
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Compactline 100 and Compactline 50 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Compactline 100MetricCompactline 50
10 MPEffective pixels5 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.69 µmPixel pitch2.39 µm
2.85 µm²Pixel area5.69 µm²
35.14 MP/cm²Pixel density17.57 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
120 gWeight82 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
—Battery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Compactline 100 and Compactline 50 have the same sensor area. The Compactline 50 has the lighter body. The Compactline 100 has the higher effective resolution. The Compactline 50 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Compactline 100

Released in 2008, Compactline 100 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Compactline 50

Released in 2009, Compactline 50 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 82 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras