CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Ricoh G800
vs Ricoh HZ15

Archive illustration for Ricoh G800

Ricoh / 2014

G800

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Ricoh HZ15

Ricoh / 2013

HZ15

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
G800
28 mm²
HZ15
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The G800 and HZ15 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

G800MetricHZ15
16 MPEffective pixels16 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.33 µmPixel pitch1.33 µm
1.78 µm²Pixel area1.78 µm²
56.22 MP/cm²Pixel density56.22 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
1,920 × 1,080Maximum video—
318 gWeight203 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC
2 AAA alkaline batteriesBatteryRechargeable lithium-ion battery LB-050 Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The G800 and HZ15 have the same sensor area. The HZ15 has the lighter body. The G800 and HZ15 have the same effective resolution. The G800 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose G800

Released in 2014, G800 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16 MP effective resolution, and a 318 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose HZ15

Released in 2013, HZ15 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16 MP effective resolution, and a 203 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras