CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Ricoh Caplio 400G Wide
vs Ricoh Caplio RR30

Archive illustration for Ricoh Caplio 400G Wide

Ricoh / 2003

Caplio 400G Wide

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Ricoh Caplio RR30

Ricoh / 2002

Caplio RR30

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
Caplio 400G Wide
21 mm²
Caplio RR30
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Caplio 400G Wide and Caplio RR30 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Caplio 400G WideMetricCaplio RR30
3.34 MPEffective pixels3.24 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
2.53 µmPixel pitch2.57 µm
6.38 µm²Pixel area6.58 µm²
15.67 MP/cm²Pixel density15.2 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
355 gWeight200 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AA, Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Caplio 400G Wide and Caplio RR30 have the same sensor area. The Caplio RR30 has the lighter body. The Caplio 400G Wide has the higher effective resolution. The Caplio 400G Wide is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Caplio 400G Wide

Released in 2003, Caplio 400G Wide has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.34 MP effective resolution, and a 355 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Caplio RR30

Released in 2002, Caplio RR30 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.24 MP effective resolution, and a 200 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras